Paper: Understanding failures in health data protection

Many health data breaches aren’t just caused by hackers. Inadequate processes and irresponsible use of health data often create opportunities for serious cybersecurity incidents. In our study, experts recounted staff admitting, “I didn’t know, nobody told me,” or using personal Gmail for sensitive communications. One cybersecurity expert observed, “[Healthcare ecosystems] are not good at these things [data protection by design]. We say that they don’t bake in security; they just bake the cake and spray on some [cyber]security.”

Our mixed-methods study, published in Behaviour & Information Technology (open access explored these critical vulnerabilities in health data protection. We gathered insights from cybersecurity and privacy experts across 14 countries, including CISOs, IT security officers, researchers, privacy managers, and Data Protection Officers.

We identified 30 failure factors and, using the People-Process-Technology framework, unpacked the top seven:

  • People: non-compliant behaviour, and lack of cybersecurity awareness
  • Process: inadequate risk management, weak data integrity monitoring, and a lack of breach response and recovery plans
  • Technology: unsecure third-party applications, and a lack of data protection by design

These factors often interlink, creating complex vulnerabilities. With the growing adoption of big data analytics and AI in healthcare, understanding these failure points is crucial. Our model offers actionable insights for healthcare organisations to strengthen data protection, develop mitigation policies, and reduce the risk of breaches, ensuring safer care and maintaining trust.

Towards a model for understanding failures in health data protection: a mixed-methods study, Javad Pool, Saeed Akhlaghpour, Farkhondeh Hassandoust, Farhad Fatehi & Andrew Burton-Jones

AI Horizons – Conversations with Australia’s leading and emerging researchers

On 22 September, CIRES Centre Director Prof. Shazia Sadiq FTSE hosted AI Horizons – Conversations with Australia’s leading and emerging researchers, an inspiring event organised by the Australian Academy of Technological Sciences & Engineering (ATSE). The event brought together brilliant minds in AI—from established experts to rising stars—to explore the future of artificial intelligence in Australia.

Speakers: Dr Sue Keay FTSE UNSW AI Institute, Dr Scarlett Raine & Prof. Michael Milford FTSE QUT Centre for Robotics, & Hung Lee & Distinguished Prof. Svetha Venkatesh FTSE FAA Deakin University.

Watch on YouTube: AI horizons – Conversations with Australia’s leading and emerging researchers

 

 

Research Insight: New Approach for Irregular Time Series in Healthcare AI

EMIT: A New Approach for Irregular Time Series in Healthcare AI

Excited to share our paper “EMIT: Event-Based Masked Auto Encoding for Irregular Time Series” published at ICDM 2024. Together with A/Prof. Sen WANG, Dr Ruihong Qiu, A/Prof. Adam Irwin and Prof. Shazia Sadiq, we explore how irregular time series (like vital signs and lab results recorded at uneven intervals) challenge existing AI models and how our proposed framework, EMIT, improves clinical decision support through better representation learning. Special thanks to CIRES, Queensland Health and The University of Queensland for supporting this research.

Read full paper at https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.16554

 

Our Approach
We introduce EMIT, a pretraining framework based on transformer architecture, tailored for irregular clinical time series data. EMIT learns by:

  • Finding important points in irregular time series
  • Pretraining by masking and predicting those points
  • Use the pretrained model for any downstream task (e.g., outcome prediction)

Key Findings

Improved Representation Learning: EMIT captures important variations without losing timing information, outperforming generic pretext approaches for irregular time series.

Data Efficiency: On benchmark healthcare datasets (MIMIC-III & PhysioNet Challenge 2012), EMIT achieved strong results using only 50% of labeled data, reducing reliance on costly annotations.

Task Relevance: By designing pretext tasks specific to irregular time series, EMIT delivers more reliable clinical predictions compared to standard forecasting approaches.

How can we design AI that adapts to the messy, irregular reality of clinical data while still delivering trustworthy predictions?